CategoryFraud Warning

State v. Williams

S

*********************************************** The “officially released” date that appears near the be- ginning of each opinion is the date the opinion will be pub- lished in the Connecticut Law Journal or the date it was released as a slip opinion. The operative date for the be- ginning of all time periods for filing postopinion motions and petitions for certification is the “officially...

Rose v. Commissioner of Correction

R

*********************************************** The “officially released” date that appears near the be- ginning of each opinion is the date the opinion will be pub- lished in the Connecticut Law Journal or the date it was released as a slip opinion. The operative date for the be- ginning of all time periods for filing postopinion motions and petitions for certification is the “officially...

State v. Edwards

S

*********************************************** The “officially released” date that appears near the be- ginning of each opinion is the date the opinion will be pub- lished in the Connecticut Law Journal or the date it was released as a slip opinion. The operative date for the be- ginning of all time periods for filing postopinion motions and petitions for certification is the “officially...

Northeast Builders Supply & Home Centers, LLC v. RMM Consulting, LLC

N

*********************************************** The “officially released” date that appears near the be- ginning of each opinion is the date the opinion will be pub- lished in the Connecticut Law Journal or the date it was released as a slip opinion. The operative date for the be- ginning of all time periods for filing postopinion motions and petitions for certification is the “officially...

State v. Ferrazzano-Mazza

S

*********************************************** The “officially released” date that appears near the be- ginning of each opinion is the date the opinion will be pub- lished in the Connecticut Law Journal or the date it was released as a slip opinion. The operative date for the be- ginning of all time periods for filing postopinion motions and petitions for certification is the “officially...

Maxx McQuay Pritchett v. State

M

Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia ATLANTA,____________________ January 13, 2021 The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order: A21D0167. MAXX MCQUAY PRITCHETT v. THE STATE. On November 11, 2020, the trial court entered an order granting Maxx McQuay Pritchett permission to file an out-of-time appeal. Pritchett then filed this pro se application for discretionary appeal in which he...

DCPP VS. A.A. AND Z.S., IN THE MATTER OF S.A., H.A., L.A. AND N.A. (FN-02-0155-14, BERGEN COUNTY AND STATEWIDE) (RECORD IMPOUNDED) (CONSOLIDATED)

D

RECORD IMPOUNDED NOT FOR PUBLICATION WITHOUT THE APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION This opinion shall not "constitute precedent or be binding upon any court ." Although it is posted on the internet, this opinion is binding only on the parties in the case and its use in other cases is limited. R. 1:36-3. SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NOS. A-2879-18T3 A-2880-18T3 NEW...

King Bird Fireworks, LLC v. Harringson Zelaya

K

Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia ATLANTA, January 15, 2021 The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order A21I0105. KING BIRD FIREWORKS, LLC v. HARRINGSON ZELAYA et al. . Upon consideration of the Application for Interlocutory Appeal, it is ordered that it be hereby DENIED. LC NUMBERS: 19CI00020 Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia Clerk's Office, Atlanta, January 15...

STATE OF NEW JERSEY VS. SALAAM REEVEY (11-03-0410, HUDSON COUNTY AND STATEWIDE)

S

NOT FOR PUBLICATION WITHOUT THE APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION This opinion shall not "constitute precedent or be binding upon any court ." Although it is posted on the internet, this opinion is binding only on the parties in the case and its use in other cases is limited. R. 1:36-3. SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-0767-19T1 STATE OF NEW JERSEY, Plaintiff...

Alden A. Tarr, Jr. v. State of Indiana (mem. dec.)

A

MEMORANDUM DECISION Pursuant to Ind. Appellate Rule 65(D), this Memorandum Decision shall not be FILED regarded as precedent or cited before any Jan 25 2021, 8:33 am court except for the purpose of establishing CLERK the defense of res judicata, collateral Indiana Supreme Court Court of Appeals and Tax Court estoppel, or the law of the case. ATTORNEY FOR APPELLANT ATTORNEYS FOR APPELLEE Stacy R...

Recent Posts

Recent Comments