Donald Kimball v. Altoona Police Dept

D
                 United States Court of Appeals
                             For the Eighth Circuit
                         ___________________________

                                 No. 20-2188
                         ___________________________

                                 Donald H. Kimball

                        lllllllllllllllllllllPlaintiff - Appellant

                                           v.

                    Altoona Police Dept; Greg Stallman, Chief

                      lllllllllllllllllllllDefendants - Appellees
                                       ____________

                    Appeal from United States District Court
                    for the Southern District of Iowa - Central
                                  ____________

                           Submitted: December 4, 2020
                             Filed: December 9, 2020
                                  [Unpublished]
                                  ____________

Before BENTON, KELLY, and GRASZ, Circuit Judges.
                           ____________

PER CURIAM.

      Donald Kimball appeals the district court’s 1 dismissal, under Federal Rule of
Civil Procedure 12(b), of his pro se 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action. Having carefully

      1
      The Honorable Stephanie M. Rose, United States District Judge for the
Southern District of Iowa.
reviewed the record and the parties’ arguments on appeal, we find no basis for
reversal. See Montin v. Moore, 

846 F.3d 289

, 292 (8th Cir. 2017) (de novo review
of Rule 12(b)(6) dismissal). The judgment is affirmed. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.
                      ______________________________




                                      -2-

1 comment

  • Read the case! You will see that the courts are dismissing the case to clear their dockets because I am pro SE. There is clearly several civil rights violations. I had supportive arguments from not only the Supreme Court, but also the Eighth District. It’s shameful that we are going to allow our law enforcement to do what they please under the guise of qualified immunity and discretionary function.
    This needs to stop. The court is saying that police officers can do whatever they want even if they infringe on constitutional rights. Where are we headed?

By Tucker

Recent Posts

Recent Comments